Dr. Michael McDowell Warns Covid-19 Was Engineered and the Vaccines are Causing “Death Spirals” Around the World
Dr. Michael McDowell lays out the evidence that Covid-19 (SARS-Covid2) was not only engineered with assistance by labs in the U.S., but also funded jointly by China and the U.S. He also described on how the genetically-altering Covid-19 vaccines are dangerous and causing frightening “death spirals” in countries like Trinidad and Tobago. The data from the World-o-Meter also support this interpretation.
From Dr. Michael McDowell’s video on Footprint:
In response to the SARS CoV-2 bio engineered virus and the subsequent Covid-19 experimental mRNA drug (vaccine), Dr. Michael McDowell breaks down the truth in the science and makes some shocking revelations about big pharma, the US health agencies
and the United States government and the attempted efforts to conceal damning information.
In four months, “14% of the people died before the vaccine. 86% of the people died after the vaccine.”
Smoking Gun #2
Documentary Proof: University of North Carolina Generated COVID-19
A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence (PDF)
Smoking Gun #3
Research conducted at Australian animal health lab, funded by Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology to weaponized SARS virus
Smoking Gun #4
Covid-19 lab leak theory: Indian scientists had flagged ‘unnatural insertions’ in its genome, were forced to withdraw study
Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag (PDF)
Smoking Gun #5-#6
Fauci was warned that COVID-19 may have been ‘engineered,’ emails show
Andersen, who runs a viral genomics lab at Scripps Research in La Jolla, Calif., wrote back, “The problem is that our phylogenetic analyses aren’t able to answer whether the sequences are unusual at individual residues, except if they are completely off.
“The unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the genome (<0.1%) so one has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered,” he wrote.
Andersen also noted that he and others “all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory” but added that “there are still further analyses to be done, so those opinions could still change.”
Leave a Reply